Strike a balance between native and branded Facebook Ads 

by Konstantin Tomic, Insights Manager at EyeSee

This year marks 20 years since Facebook revolutionized the way we use the internet. A lot happened during that time, but as it changed the advertising landscape and influenced its users’ daily lives, Facebook evolved as well.   

Facebook may not be the place to find the youngest audience (though its audience is diverse and earns money) or the “hottest” platform right now, but some facts are simply unbeatable.  As of the end of 2023, the number of Facebook users worldwide is around 3.05 billion. 

  • 50% of the time spent on Facebook and Instagram is spent watching videos. 
  • 2B+ people watch Facebook in-stream-eligible videos each month. 
  • 74% of Facebook in-stream non-skippable video ad views are completed, globally. 

So, the question is not whether there should be an investment in Facebook ads, but rather how to do so effectively. As my colleague previously stated, it is critical to test ads because relying solely on platform analytics is insufficient to gain clarity and insights into why some ads are “working” and what their true brand impact is. To gain those insights simulated replicated feeds are proving to be the best tool for capturing user behavior.

A good replicated feed will make respondents forget they’re part of research  

Researchers should always be mindful of response bias – a phenomenon where individuals consciously or unconsciously alter their answers to align with perceived social norms, expectations, or desires. Factors such as social desirability bias, where respondents provide socially acceptable responses rather than honest ones, can distort findings. But even smaller things can affect the answers too. Wording of questions, order of presentation, interviewer effects, and respondent characteristics like age, gender, or cultural background can all impact how individuals respond. Awareness of these biases is critical in designing surveys and conducting research to minimize their influence and ensure more reliable data collection and analysis. 

To minimize biases, it is best to provide respondents with a realistic environment in which tracking devices and differences from their usual habits are difficult to detect. In the case of social media replicated feeds, respondents participate in the study from the comfort of their own homes, and some even admit that there were times when they forgot they were not using “the real thing.” 

Native VS Branded ad memorability paradox

Native content outperforms branded ads in retaining attention by captivating audiences with surprising product usage and compelling, attention-grabbing audio. Younger viewers engage with native content for longer durations, making it an ideal choice for subtly targeting this demographic. Additionally, native ads are clearer, largely due to their prominent product features. However, they pose a challenge in terms of memorability since they rely solely on the video to convey branding, which users may overlook. In contrast, branded ad posts benefit from additional cues like account names and video descriptions, enhancing brand memorability. 

The path to balanced native and branded video ads  

The first and most obvious recommendation is for marketers to test their ads. Knowing which parts of the video to tweak can help achieve a native-branded balance. Even past campaigns contain knowledge, and testing them can provide brands and marketers with a best-practice guidebook for future creative input.   However, if you already have native content in your hands, here’s a small bonus tip. If focusing on younger audiences – ads with a native feel could be the way but take care to post from the official brand account with an informative description. If the goal is to raise awareness among the general population – a traditional branded ad is a more reliable option.  


Eager to know more about ad testing on other social media platforms? Research hidden potential with new TikTok creative insights.

    Behavioral insights: Backbone of successful co-branding initiatives

    Written by Jason Bradbury, Sr. Director of Client Service at EyeSee

    I am a simple individual and perhaps a creature of habit – choosing peanut M&Ms as my go-to sweet snack, relying on Cinnabon k-cups for my daily coffee fix and letting Apple technology keep me well-organized and connected.

    While data (and life) confirm I am not a lone example of a consumer having favorite brands, recent research shows that these loyalties are first to go as we adjust to the mounting pressures of the global recession. Apart from tinkering with variables of pricing and volume, there are other strategies your brand might explore to preempt eroding loyalty.

    In fact, there’s a good chance one of your new favorite products may just be the result of two separate brands working together – the fruit of a co-branding or licensed partnership initiative. If your goals for 2023 include:

    • Reconnecting with or Expanding your consumer base;
    • Evolving your brand identity or reputation;
    • Innovating the product;
    • And/or all the above…

    …then co-branding may be the right strategy for you! However, this approach does carry certain risks and mitigating them should be a top priority. Here’s how behavioral research can help.  

    Know your shifting consumer and (re-frame) their needs

    75% of brands could disappear tomorrow … and most consumers wouldn’t care. On top of this, shoppers are already actively engaging in brand-switching behavior due to rising inflation. By exploring collaborations within or across categories, you are opening a whole world of possibilities to either deepen the connection with existing consumers or to expand your base.  

    Well-known consumer products entering into a partnership with Disney is one such example.   Disney-licensed characters are displayed on Huggies diapers, Band-Aid adhesive bandages and even Gucci collections! Disney characters are iconic, instantly recognizable, and intergenerational.  Through these collaborations, these brands have managed to overcome their challenges in creating appeal and eliciting an emotional response, which has an enduring effect on retaining brand loyalty but also helps draw consideration among new potential customers.

    The journey of successful co-branding begins with understanding the intersection of consumers and their behaviors. Pre-testing your advertising materials (online videos, TVC, social media posts, etc.) and packs can give you crucial insight into how consumers will see, react, evaluate, and if they would ultimately be inspired to purchase your co-branded product. A mixed-method approach, where behavioral methods of eye tracking, facial coding and virtual shopping are combined with surveys, can measure such preferences with as much as an 80% correlation with actual shopping behavior.

    Introduce agile reality-checks to your co-branding initiative

    On average, less than 20% of product and pack innovations prove to be a success. Adopting an iterative approach and testing at each step of development increases the chances of yielding a positive result.

    More specifically, there are 3 main points where behavioral research can play a big part in shaping your co-branding initiative:

    • Screening: start testing early in the process (even concepts and drafts!) and narrow down your options. Leverage more granular sub-category criteria, including usage frequency, understanding brand awareness and openness to purchasing the product, and even filtering on geolocation. With every added testing criterion, the potential risk of a new launch gets smaller.
    • Test in context: use virtual simulations of stores and retail environments to tap into authentic consumer behavior with high accuracy. The same goes for e-commerce – any website or webpage, such as Amazon, Target, Kroger can be replicated. Having the ability and agility to put respondents in a context that feels familiar and authentic is key in estimating the success of the co-branding strategy.
    • Volumetric and Market share projection: test claims, pricing, and other aspects of launch to estimate in-market success, switching behavior and opportunities for driving share within the first year.

    Make co-branding resonate: Optimize at every touchpoint

    Experts concur that having a seamless and experience-driven path to purchase is more important now than ever. Shoppers’ expectations are changing – and brands must be aware of the hyper-sensitivity of their customers. Thus, co-branding can be an effective tool to not only enhance brand or product communication, but could also serve as a potential visual cue for highlighting variety or sub-line differences.

    Additionally, there are many widely overlooked opportunities within omnichannel – optimizing touch points such as e-commerce pack shots being one of them. Hero images can significantly boost sales by attracting more attention. They garner 5% higher visibility than Standard Package Designs on desktop (with even greater potential on mobile because of the smaller screen size) and can increase sales by about 15%. Considering these key touchpoints when implementing a co-branding strategy can significantly boost your chances of success.

    Summary

    Co-branding is all about expanding opportunities to connect viscerally with the consumer. By introducing new propositions and potentially enhancing communication by leveraging the established equities of each brand, you are generating broader interest and/or emotional response, which has a positive effect on consumer retention.

    Adopting behavioral methods and testing within contextual shopping environments allows more authentic and predictive insight into how your co-branded product will perform. This type of feedback minimizes the risk of unfruitful investment and represents a definite advantage – even more so under the pressures of recession, where consumers are increasingly fickle and marketing budgets precious.

      Thanks for your interest!

      We”ll get back to you promptly